Towards the end of the book, on p. 247, Ishmael shares that all of his other pupils, once they learned what needed to change, would say "Yes, yes, this is wonderful -- but people are not going to relinquish their hold on the world. It just can't happen. Never. Not in a thousand years." Ishmael then concedes that he couldn't provide a "hopeful example to the contrary," but that now he has one: the dismantling of Marxism. "Once the people of [the former Soviet Union] were inspired by the possibility of a new way of life, the dismantling took place almost overnight."
I'm not entirely convinced that this provides sufficient proof that people -- the Takers -- can change to the degree needed to restore balance on the planet, as outlined by Quinn. It would require a fundamental shift in the way people think -- one that does not adhere to the tenets of capitalism -- for the Takers to become part of the world and take only what they need. In this way, the example Ishmael provides does parallel what would need to happen: the dismantling of capitalism.
Also, the fact that there are now more than 6 billion people on this planet -- and growing steadily -- also makes me unsure that it is realistic to believe that people would be willing to adopt the population measures Quinn alludes to in his book, exemplified by tribalistic societies. And a controlled population is necessary if humans are not to prevent other species access to food.
I want to believe that the restoration of balance on earth is possible, but I need help! What are your thoughts?Statistics: Posted by Mannie Dalton — Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:37 pm
]]>