|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Patty Blair
All-star
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 7:26 am Posts: 33
|
I found the author's conclusion that bottom up won't work a little hasty in that I think it takes a merging of both a bottom up and top down effort to effect any long lasting changes or full reallization for all concerning the "power issues" and related silent, unspoken, or unheard consequences.
What do you think?
|
Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:54 pm |
|
|
Beth McCracken
All-star
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 5:05 pm Posts: 40
|
Perhaps I'm overlooking something, but it seems that in some situations "bottom up" can initiate change. Usually change is "top down", but there wouldn't be successful unions if "bottom up" didn't work sometimes.
|
Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:47 pm |
|
|
Craig Gilman
All-star
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:21 am Posts: 62
|
I think that change begin at the bottom, but that ultimately it has to occur at the top to induce societal, and legal change. Then, coincidentally it moves back down and effects change at the bottom. WHen it it heads back down, then it changes those who didn't change with the bottomw crowd initially.
_________________ "But we shall rightly call a philosopher the man who is easily willing to learn every kind of knowledge, gladly turns to learning things. and is insatiable in this respect." Socrates
|
Wed Dec 03, 2003 12:43 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|